The magic eight
Eight
is a lucky number in
Eight
is also the percentage by which, the economists believe, the Chinese economy
must grow to provide jobs to the millions of students graduating from
Universities, or the rural folks migrating to the cities in search of a better
life. The first two quarters of this year have been difficult –
Clearly
the magic has been achieved with a lot of stimulus - Chinese government is trying to spend four
trillion yuan in stimulating the economy. Money is being poured into building
roads, bridges and some income generating activities. In the first nine months
of the GDP growth of 7.7 percent, 7.3 percent came from investment and 4
percentage points from consumption (decease in exports brought down the total
figure to 7.7%). Exports continue to decline, though as the mood in the
Consumer
Economist say (softly in China and more shrilly in the West) that the Chinese consumer must spend more to compensate for the loss of exports and redress the global imbalance where the American consumers were sustaining the global economy with their profligate consumption of Chinese goods and the Chinese Consumers saving as much as one-fourth of their incomes. Hence the critical question now is whether the Chinese consumer will spend more and save the global economy.
The traditional reason that is given for the Chinese consumer to save a large proportion of their income is that a large number of them do not enjoy social security and need to set aside for their retirement and possible medical expenses. Secondly, culturally Chinese are considered to be thrifty and saving rather than consumption is considered a virtue. While these factors – whether cultural or structural – do contribute to the Chinese households stashing away a large proportion of their income there are other social and emotional reasons for this behaviour.
The other barriers to consumption
Owning
an house ranks among the most important desires and goals for a Chinese. The
idea of living in rented accommodation is alien and unacceptable. Traditionally
Chinese have liked the idea of stability and state provided that by allotting
life long accommodation, which you keep even after retirement. With state
housing gone for most, the Chinese are rushing to buy apartments. The strong
demand coupled with a relatively controlled supply has made the cost of housing
disproportionate to the consumers’ income. Today the average per capita annual urban
disposable income in
On the other hand social norms today make the idea of continuing to live with the parents after marriage as nearly inconceivable (no pun intended) and no self-respecting woman will accept a man’s hand in marriage unless the hand holds the keys to an apartment. With low starting salaries even for University graduates, parents need to bear the burden of saving for the down payment. The high mortgage payments in relation to the income further reduces the spending ability of the consumers.
Secondly,
while impending marriage of the child brings a substantial financial burden for
the family, the university education before that is also a formidable expense.
As
Thirdly the average Chinese consumer is value driven. Products receive a microscopic scrutiny and intensive comparison and valuation. Prices are compared thoroughly and promotions and deals welcomed enthusiastically. While there is a trend of premiumisation, it is not universal and applies more to products of visible consumption which can make the consumer look good and successful. Additionally the disappointment that many consumers faced, when the salary increases and bonuses were less than generous in the beginning of the year or the business growth challenged, has thrown a spanner on the path of moving to premium products.
Hence while the Chinese consumer will gradually spend more, and consumption as a proportion of the Chinese GDP will move up from its uniquely low level today, the movement is going to be gradual unless significant changes are made to make housing and education more accessible and affordable and the consumer regains the confidence of continued prosperity.
Written by Ashok Sethi, TNS
ashok.set@gmail.com
ashok.sethi@tns-global.com
Wiser
counsel seems to have prevailed. Muntadhar al-Zeidi, condemned for three years
in Iraqi jail for throwing shoes at George Bush is out in six months They
pronounced a three years sentence for a brave visionary who tried to change the
world through innovative thinking! If we need to put Al-Zeidi, the Iraqi hero
for flinging his shoes at George Bush behind bars, why not put all the marketing
gurus and most of all Philip Kotler in jail, whose text book of marketing
management clearly describes the marketing strategies of market expansion and
product extension.
It
was a remarkable demonstration of the innovative thinking that the Guangdong
Shoe Export Association hired Al-Zeidy to throw a pair of shoes at George Bush
and demonstrate a new use for the product to boost its sagging demand. Imagine,
if people started throwing shoes as well as wearing them? With millions of appropriate
and deserving targets and billions of potential throwers, the factories can
open their gates again and the workers can get back to the task of stitching
the uppers to the soles. The Chinese government’s buy-in and support was
secured, and the Prime Minister Wen Jia Bao himself volunteered to be the
spokesman and a target for shoes in
A whole new world
Special shoes will be designed for bankers, made from sub-prime materials and leveraged at the heels. The politicians will get thick leather shoes to match the thickness of their own hides. The insurance companies will get shoes, the risk of wearing which will match the risk profile of the assets that they insured. We could even get rating agencies to rate the shoe in terms of aerodynamics, the speed and distance to which it can travel, and how much it will hurt when it will hurt the target.
The market could be segmented both by the thrower and the throwee – stilettos for the highbrow, the humble canvas shoe for the amateur, sneakers for the nimble, athletic types and budget shoes for those on a shoe-string. Shoes could be color coordinated for maximum impact – black shoes for Obama, white for Bush, brown for Manmohan Singh and yellow for Wen Jiabao.
Shoe for a shoe
The mind boggles at the opportunity, if the principle of “a tooth for a tooth and a nail for a nail” could be extended to “a shoe for a shoe”. The great leaders and the eminent public speakers, would then come to the meetings equipped with their own set of shoes, to fling them back at any miscreant who dares to throw one at them. Imagine public meetings, in which shoes are flying like rockets in each direction and every swing contributing to the rescue of shoe industry in Southern China, and ultimately to the rejuvenation of the global economy.
“Let me make it very clear,” president Obama said. “White House will not abandon the view that a shoe is a wearable accessory, whose primary role is protection and adornment of the feet. However, if it can find additional utility as a saviour of the global economy, I am sure Secretary Geitner will welcome it with open arms.”
In
Dongguan in
Written
by Ashok Sethi
Ashok.set@gmail.com